Case 2 - Rubric Risk Investigators:
The risks of exposure to radon for people and how to communicate them and educate the public.|
Beginning (1) |
Developing (2) |
Accomplished (3) |
Exemplary (4) |
|
Guiding Question #1 “Health and Environmental risks” |
The response provides some evidence that there is a health threat to human life from radon. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and examples and sources specific to Pitchblende Estates & Pitchville are included. |
Prior description and effects include relevant physiology, neurology, and behavior. |
|
Guiding Question #2 “Safe levels of Radon” |
The response provides some evidence on levels of radon considered to be safe. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and examples and sources specific to Pitchblende Estates & Pitchville are included. |
Prior description and specific information on outside environment, inside environment and foods are included. |
|
Guiding Question #3 “How to communicate risk” |
The response addresses how the risk will be communicated. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and the response lists a variety of ways to communicate risk. |
Prior description and the various approaches are linked to the audience and situation. |
|
Guiding Questions #4 & #5 “Sequence and Content for Different Groups” |
The responses address who will be communicated with. |
Prior description and the responses include in what order the communication will take place and whether different groups will receive different information. |
Prior description and the responses are supported with specific references. |
Prior description and the sequence and content of the communication is linked to the audience and situation. |
|
Guiding Question #6 “Real vs Perceived risk” |
The response addresses how real vs perceived risk is dealt with. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and the response includes the effect of perceived control. |
Prior description and the response includes examples related to risks associated with radon. |
|
Guiding Question #7 “Clean up risk” |
The response addresses how clean-up should be conducted in order to minimize risk. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and the clean-up approach(es) is/are related to routes of exposure. |
Prior description, the response is accurate and it is specific to the situation in Pitchblende Estates & Pitchville. |
|
Guiding Question #8 “Public Education” |
The response addresses how the public will be educated. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and the plan includes different approaches for different people and populations. |
Prior description, the response is accurate and it is specific to the situation in Pitchblende Estates & Pitchville. |
|
Collaboration “Contribution and Responsibility” |
The participant works within their role while researching and gathering information. |
Prior description and the participant shares relevant information with teammates. |
Prior description and the participant has a high frequency of communication with teammates. |
Prior description and the participant completes all work in a timely fashion. |
|
Collaboration “Working as a team” |
The participant provides and receives feedback during the work on section B. |
Prior description and the participant accepts and uses feedback from teammates. |
Prior description and the participant works to include all team members in the process. |
Prior description and the participant works to mediate problems within the team. |