Case 1 - Rubric Impact Investigators:
Strategies for cleanup and reduction of exposure to radon in Ramavalley Estates.|
Beginning (1) |
Developing (2) |
Accomplished (3) |
Exemplary (4) |
|
Guiding Question #1 “Mitigation options” |
The response describes mitigation options. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and approaches specific to the situation in Ramavalley Estates are included. |
Prior description and the response is accurate. |
|
Guiding Question #2 “Who is responsible?” |
The response addresses who is responsible for different types of mitigation. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and a summary of roles and cases from the research are included. |
Prior description, the response is accurate, and it provides examples relevant to Ramavalley Estates. |
|
Guiding Question #3 “Mitigation Cost” |
The response addresses the costs involved with mitigation. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and an example from the research is included. |
Prior description and cost estimates are attempted for all or part of Ramavalley Estates. |
|
Guiding Question #4 “Who will pay?” |
The response addresses who is responsible to pay for mitigation. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and a summary of roles and cases from the research are included. |
Prior description, the response is accurate, and it provides examples relevant to Ramavalley Estates. |
|
Guiding Question #5 “Cost/benefit analysis” |
The responses discusses a cost/benefit analysis of mitigation. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and includes concepts of risk assessment, risk perception, and diminishing returns. |
Prior description, the response is accurate and examples are provided linked to the situation in Ramavalley Estates. |
|
Guiding Question #6 |
The response addresses how mitigation is enforced. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and a summary of roles, cases, and fines from the research are included. |
Prior description, the response is accurate and it includes the roles of the EPA, DEP, local law enforcement, EOSHA, and the Dept. of Health. |
|
Guiding Question #7 “Legal/judicial involvement” |
The response addresses the role of the legal/judicial system in the mitigation process. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and a summary of roles, cases, and fines from the research are included. |
Prior description and the response is accurate. |
|
Guiding Question #8 “Implementation of Pollution Prevention” |
The response addresses the extent to which the waste stream should be altered or cleaned up. |
Prior description and the response is supported with specific references. |
Prior description and the plan includes different approaches for different sources. |
Prior description, the response is accurate and it is specific to the situations and sources at Ramavalley Estates. |
|
Collaboration “Contribution and Responsibility” |
The participant works within their role while researching and gathering information. |
Prior description and the participant shares relevant information with teammates. |
Prior description and the participant has a high frequency of communication with teammates. |
Prior description and the participant completes all work in a timely fashion. |
|
Collaboration “Working as a team” |
The participant provides and receives feedback during the work on section B. |
Prior description and the participant accepts and uses feedback from teammates. |
Prior description and the participant works to include all team members in the process. |
Prior description and the participant works to mediate problems within the team. |